Clay, Calhoun, Webster :: American America History

Clay, Calhoun, WebsterIn 1816, soon after the end of the War of 1812, the British, who had failed to defeat the Americans in battle, attempted to shut down the newly formed American manufacturing business. They were direct over materials to the U.S. and extremely low prices in an effort to crate a stronghold over the U.S. These actions lead to the Tariff of 1816, which placed a 20-30% appraise on all imported goods, in an attempt to protect U.S. industries. buckram debate arose over these issues in Congress, and strong leaders came about with those debates, in align to represent the feelings of the different areas in America. These three leaders were heat content Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster. Webster was a vox from the North, a New Hampshire resident, who strongly contrasted the Tariff of 1816. The view of the New England territory was for some protection, but not the entire amount outlined in the tariff. Their reasoning was that New England shut up maintained ma ny of its reliances on shipping and trade. Industry had not altogether taken over in those areas, and because the tariff would limit trade in the New England ports, it would directly effect the New England economy. Webster took a strong stick up in opposing this tariff for these very reasons, he in order to maintaining the well being of the northern states. Webster also stood against Clays insistence for better window pane amongst the states. He went along with the New England belief that better roads would march on migration towards the lands of the West, therefore dwindling the population of the Northern states. John Calhoun, a representative from South Carolina, also played a large roll in the congressional debates in the early 1800s. A fierce nationalist and former warhawk, he was much in favor of the Tariff of 1816. He believed that the Souths in store(predicate) lay in the hands of manufacturing of cotton and other such products. With England attempt to crush these indu stries, he saw the tariff as a instrumental resource for his region. He later changed his position, opposing the tariff as he came to believe that the tariff only benefited the wealthy factory owners of the North, and did little to serve well the South. He looked out for the best interest of his state and the other states of the South. enthalpy Clay was another strong supporter of the Tariff of 1816.