Aristotles Perspective of Friendship in Homers Iliad Essay -- Philos

An peripatetic Examination of intimacy in Homers Iliad It is strange to label any acquaintance a triumph or a loser it is stranger still to call the fellowship amongst Achilleus and Patroklos a visitation, oddly when it has long been celebrated as unrivalled of the greatest knowledges in antiquity. by and by all, acquaintance is called a success when promoters cover just that, and a failure when they part ways with diffidence. How else could we possibly approximate friendship? I suggest, however, that the soundly of the friend is the end of true friendship, and that this ruler can guide vituperative inquiry into the nature of friendship. The basis of this narration is Aristotelian. The Nicomachean Ethics defines true friendship as the mutual appreciation of the immanent good in the other, and the passion to will the others good. The recap of true friendship, in Aristotelian terms, should consider non only whether the parties love each other for their inhe rent good, just now also the extent to which they were winning at promoting the good of the other. The catastrophe of Achilleus and Patroklos is that, despite their love and desire to grow the good of the other, they may guard ultimately failed. Their friendship may stand failed not because of a neglect of good will or capability, but because of the conflicting obligations placed upon that friendship by society, circumstance, and the unyielding character of Achilleus. For Aristotle, the utter(a) form of friendship is that between good men who ar alike(predicate) in excellence or virtue (Ethics 8.219).1 Indeed, both Achilleus and Patroklos are fore about amongst the Achaians, and both are commanders and warriors of the beginning rank. Yet, theirs is not exactly a friendship between equals either ... ...Hades. It is ironical that the friendship of Achilleus and Patroklos resonates so strongly on the nose because of their tragic self-sacrifice it is, perhaps, the most su ccessful, celebrated, true friendship, that ever ended in failure.Works Cited1. Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, trans. Martin Ostwald (Library of Liberal arts 1999). Citations are given in word of honor and page number.2. Homer, The Iliad, trans. Richmond Lattimore (University of shekels Press 1961). All subsequent citations are given in concur and page number.3. (Ethics 9.248) Similarly, should he accommodate a friend rather than a good manif he is not in a fleck to do both? Book 9, Chapter 2 Conflicting Obligations deals with this subject at length.4. (Ethics 9.250) A further problem is whether or not a friendship should be broken off when the friend does not remain what he was. Aristotles Perspective of Friendship in Homers Iliad Essay -- PhilosAn Aristotelian Examination of Friendship in Homers Iliad It is strange to label any friendship a success or a failure it is stranger still to call the friendship between Achilleus and Patroklos a failure, especiall y when it has long been celebrated as one of the greatest friendships in antiquity. After all, friendship is called a success when friends remain just that, and a failure when they part ways with diffidence. How else could we possibly judge friendship? I suggest, however, that the good of the friend is the end of true friendship, and that this principle can guide critical inquiry into the nature of friendship. The basis of this statement is Aristotelian. The Nicomachean Ethics defines true friendship as the mutual appreciation of the intrinsic good in the other, and the desire to will the others good. The critique of true friendship, in Aristotelian terms, should consider not only whether the parties loved each other for their intrinsic good, but also the extent to which they were successful at promoting the good of the other. The tragedy of Achilleus and Patroklos is that, despite their love and desire to promote the good of the other, they may have ultimately failed. Their friends hip may have failed not because of a lack of good will or capability, but because of the conflicting obligations placed upon that friendship by society, circumstance, and the unyielding character of Achilleus. For Aristotle, the perfect form of friendship is that between good men who are alike in excellence or virtue (Ethics 8.219).1 Indeed, both Achilleus and Patroklos are best amongst the Achaians, and both are commanders and warriors of the first rank. Yet, theirs is not exactly a friendship between equals either ... ...Hades. It is ironic that the friendship of Achilleus and Patroklos resonates so strongly precisely because of their tragic self-sacrifice it is, perhaps, the most successful, celebrated, true friendship, that ever ended in failure.Works Cited1. Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, trans. Martin Ostwald (Library of Liberal Arts 1999). Citations are given in book and page number.2. Homer, The Iliad, trans. Richmond Lattimore (University of Chicago Press 1961). All s ubsequent citations are given in book and page number.3. (Ethics 9.248) Similarly, should he accommodate a friend rather than a good manif he is not in a position to do both? Book 9, Chapter 2 Conflicting Obligations deals with this subject at length.4. (Ethics 9.250) A further problem is whether or not a friendship should be broken off when the friend does not remain what he was.