'Nuremberg Trial Essay\r'

'The Struggle for Justice: Nuremberg Trial. by and by Germany was thwarted in World War II. Millions innocent hoi polloi had lost their lives. The examinations were held at the Palace of Justice in Nuremberg, Germany. There were many national socialist leadershiphip who were infra suspicion and the from totally of those the top national socialist leaders were called to go on trial and retri furtheroryify in that respect reasons to committing war law-breakings and war against humanity for the execution of the Jews, and just now for killing many plenty innocent mess.\r\nHermann Goering, Albert scape, Wilhelm Keitel and Hans frump be just a few of the national socialist defendants in the trial. They defended themselves even though there was a lot of proof proving that they were guilty. In this es translate we are going to take care all the defenses utilize by these four national socialist defendants. Hermann Goering was the reichmarschell and air force of import, he was the president of Reichstag, and director of the â€Å"four year aim” In the Nuremberg Trial he gestated powerfully that he was non guilty and did non regret what he did, that this was non what every whizz else seemed to count on.\r\nWhen Goering was asked about the c formerlyntration camps in the trial and who decided upon them, he record ” The approximation was mine, It was a question of removing danger only ane cause was available protective custody. How can the companionship rule unless it established hallow and how could it maintain order with it’s deadly enemies go badicularly the communist path free” I value that the tautness camps were used for torturing batch that were innocent and I strongly see that there were more options then just putting people in parsimoniousness camps, this was believably the easiest way to twisting hundreds of people at once kinda than doing anything else.\r\nMany people who were innocent and in a ddition many Jews who had not committed anything were taken in just for the reason that they might commit crime in the future, and simply for the hatred the had for the Jewish people, to me that is not a valid reason at all.\r\nDuring the trial there was also a movie sh cause that was created by motion pictures by allied military photographers and it showed the areas where the concentration camps were located and how people were treated, and the outcome of the camps, it clearly showed people suffering and being tortured only because they were â€Å" purportedly” a threat and might commit a crime. If someone is said to be suspicious it windlessness does not mean that they are thrown to concentration camps, or they are tortured, proof must be shown and then a decision should be make towards that individual.\r\nSadlyno one was heard and no one had the rights to rationalize themselves innocent. Many people were sent to concentration camps, it did not only happen to people who w ere suspicious merely it mainly happened to millions of innocent people and Jewish people who were simply hated because they were Jews, and to me that is racism and disrespect, and it is disgusting to see that people can take such measures, and torture human beings manage they wealthy person no rights and like they are just a pieces of toys.\r\nMost of all it is also sickening to see that many of these national socialist leaders especially Goering did not regret what they did. Keitel Wilhelm was the chief of staff of German high command, and Hans free-spoken was the governor-general of national socialist-occupied Poland, called the ” Jew foul-up of Cracow” When Hans was asked how he felt about what he had done, and was asked to rationalize how he did those things, which was shoot and kill people who were innocent, and genocides in the camps. He said that ” I don’t know, It’s as though I’m two people.\r\nThe Hans Frank you see here and the Hans Frank the Nazi leaderI wonder how the new(prenominal) Frank could do these things,This frank looks at the early(a) Frank and says your a terrible man, The other Frank said that I just wanted to keep my job” I respect that Frank realized that what he did was untimely and that he was stillness not brainwashed by the views that they were forced upon By Hitler and that were influenced by him. Many of the Nazi leaders still turn over that what they did was right, and regret zippo and show ignorance through out the trial.\r\nI do believe that a person can find oneself bad for the actions or crimes they suck up committed, which Frank showed, but unfortunately it was too late. I think that that he is brave to admit his sorrow, and that he feels terrible. On the other hand it is sad to realize that this trial was what do him realize what he did was wrong and even though he did it to keep his job which is understandable because he probably had a family to provide for and t o survive on his own. Showing sorrow cannot bring moxie and falsify anything, and what was done has happened.\r\nI wish that Hans Frank would have stopped his job which was being a Nazi leader, personally I would not want the bills I have earned knowing it was because I had killed innocent lives. The next defendant was Kietel Wilhelm, when Kietel and many other war criminals were lined up, that was the moment whenKietel says that” Only pastime orders, nothing more, you must understand” I think that since many of these Nazi leaders were used to interest orders, and that is what they had been doing for a very long time, for that reason I do not blame them for having this type of headland set.\r\nI think that what Keitel said was somewhat justifiable and the reason for that is that Hitler was the higher power and he coherent many of the Nazi leaders and if they did not exact his order and do as they were told, they were most liable(predicate) killed. The fear of bei ng killed is what kept these Nazi’s to do as they were told. With that being said, I believe that what Kietel said was something that any Nazi soldier would say or perhaps any soldier in general.\r\nAlbert Spear was the Reichminister of armaments and munitions, From all of the the other Nazi leaders he was different. He felt guilty for what he had done just like Hans Frank but when he was in trial he told the legality, and showed that he was truly sorry for his actions. One of the things that he said was ” This war has caused catastrophe” I do equate with what Spear said, and it is nice to know that he agrees with this, rather than all the other Nazi leaders who were still brainwashed and though that the war and the crimes done in them were completely fine.\r\nHe also said that ” No one is blameless for the responsibility of the crimes except the victims” After hearing what all the other ignorant Nazi leaders had to say, It was very pleasing to here this from Spear as it shows a sign of shame and that he feels ashamed of his actions. When Spear was asked if he came up with a plan to assassinate Hitler he said ” Yes I did try to assassinate Hitler” When he said this it brought heaps of hatred towards hims from the Nazi leaders as they gave him contaminating looks and were shocked that one of their own man could think of taking such actions.\r\nI for one believe that even though Spear was a Nazi, afterwards on he realized that Hitler was evil , he also said ” Hitler was a nightmare for our own making” I think that Spear rattling hated Hitler, and it was not only during the trial he realized but as he was a Nazi leader his hate for him was the reason he wanted to kill Hitler, but unfortunately that did not happen. In my opinion Spear was the only Nazi leader who knew what he was talking about and he seemed to understand that what was done, was absolutely not right, and the only one to realize that was S pear and you can also that regarding say Hans Frank.\r\nI think that the courts took what he did too seriously, which is expert but at the kindred time, he told the truth and showed that he really did feel bad for the actions of not only him but of all the others. He was gaol for 20 years on charges three and four. I understand that he was also a part of the Nazi group, and he killed many innocent victims, his views from back then have definitely changed, and I believe he is a better person from before. nevertheless you must face the consequences for what you have done, and it would only be fair.\r\nIn conclusion, some of the defenses were justifiable, but what Goering used to disengage himself was completely ridiculous and was not justifiable what so ever. Many people had lost family and relatives, and all these people wanted justice and if it were up to me, I would have stipulation some of these Nazi leaders the same torture they did to many of the innocent people, but it wa s not up to me. In the end justice was given and many of these Nazi’s were hanged to death or imprisoned.\r\n'