Comparing John Stuart Mills The Subjection of Women and Florence Night

Comparing John Stuart footles The conquering of Women and Florence nightingales CassandraFor thousands of years, women fall in struggled under the domination of men. In a great umteen societies around the world, men hold the power and women hurt to fight for their roles as equals in these patriarchal societies. Florence Nightingale wrote about such a baseball club in her piece, Cassandra, and John Stuart dweeb wrote further on the subject in his essay The Subjection of Women. These two pieces explore the uniform basic idea, hardly there are differences as well. While they some(prenominal) recognize its presence, Mill hip-hops the subjection of women on custom, and Nightingale blames it on fiat. These appear to be contrasting arguments, but they may be more similar than they seem. Mills and Nightingales work both have the main content of men dominating over women. Mill introduces his work with, the principle which regulates the live social relations between the two sexes the legal subordination of virtuoso sex to the other is wrong in itselfand it ought to be replaced by a principle of perfect equality (Mill 1156), letting the reader know his office on the issue right away. Nightingales article to a fault starts off with a strong statement in the form of a question. She wonders why women are given such useful gifts if utilizing them is socially inconceivable Why have women passion, intellect, moral activity...and a place in society where no unmatchable of the three can be exercised? (Nightingale 1734). Although these works both have the same thread running through them, they place the blame for the occurrence in different places. In Mills essay, he places the blame for the suffrage of woman on custom. He says, custom...affords i... ... sound handle completely different arguments however, they are both placing the blame on one kindred. Custom and society exist together in a underage relationship. One cannot be with out the other. Custom defines what society does, and society does what custom defines therefore, this relationship is blamed for the subjection of women in these two pieces. They may appear to have different arguments, but they are really arguing the same thing. This enforces the ideas Mill and Nightingale convey in their work two different things seemed to have been blamed, and yet, after further analysis, the blame ended up resting in the same place. We can conclude that the subjection of women is likely to rest on this crabbed relationship because both of their arguments boil down to it, and Mills and Nightingales essays are more similar than at first believed to be.